We Read the Official Exam Blueprint of 251 Certifications. Here Is What the Vendors Publish — and What They Do Not

Table of Contents
Executive Summary
We went to the source for 251 certifications from 47 providers and recorded what each vendor actually publishes. The headline: every single one publishes its question count and its official domain weights. Almost all publish a time limit and a passing score. Seven do not publish a numeric passing score at all, and twenty do not publish a price. The full dataset is free and linkable below.
- 251/251 publish a question count and official domain weights.
- 246/251 publish a time limit. Durations run from 40 minutes to 1,425 (the OSCP practical exam is 23 hours 45 minutes).
- 244/251 publish a numeric passing score — and those 244 use only 23 different values.
- 231/251 publish a price. The other twenty are either retired credentials, exams with no separate fee, or vendors who publish no price.
If you have ever wondered whether a certification exam has a published format, or what the pass mark for a given exam is, the honest answer has been scattered across 251 vendor pages. This is the same data, in one place, with the provenance of every figure attached.
What vendors publish, across 251 certifications
| Figure | Published | Missing |
|---|---|---|
| Exam domains and their weights | 251 | 0 |
| Number of questions | 251 | 0 |
| Time limit | 246 | 5 (multi-part or conflicting formats) |
| Numeric passing score | 244 | 7 (no numeric cut score published) |
| Exam price | 231 | 20 (retired, bundled, or unpublished) |
The dataset covers 47 providers — Microsoft, Oracle, Salesforce, APMG International, Cisco, CREST, AWS, Adobe, Broadcom, CompTIA, PeopleCert, Google Cloud, ISACA, ISC2, Scrum Alliance, Scrum.org, NVIDIA, Databricks, Snowflake, Fortinet and more — across 7 categories and from Foundation to Expert level.
The seven that publish no numeric passing score
These are the ones worth knowing about, because the "cut score" advice you find online is invented for them.
| Certification | What the vendor says |
|---|---|
| PMP | No numeric cut score. Results are reported per domain as Above Target, Target, Below Target or Needs Improvement. |
| PgMP | No numeric cut score. Pass/fail plus performance rating categories. |
| CEH | No fixed percentage — the cut score varies by exam form. |
| ACE | Pass/fail results only; no numeric passing score is published. |
| GCP-PCSE, GCP-PDE, GCP-PMLE | Pass/fail only; Google does not publish a numeric passing score. |
That is seven of 251 — 2,8%. It sounds small until you realise they include the two credentials people ask about most: the PMP and the AWS Certified Security Specialty. If you are planning a study budget around a "65% pass mark" for the PMP, that number came from somewhere other than PMI.
Twenty-three different passing scores for 244 exams
Collect the published cut scores and the set of distinct values is remarkably small. The most common values cluster in a narrow band, which tells you something about how these exams are constructed:
- 60, 65, 66, 68, 70, 72, 73, 74, 75, 80, 82, 83, 85 — the mass of the distribution.
- Outliers: 63 (CRT-403), 70 (ITIL 4 CDS), 82 (POPM, RTE), 73 (Salesforce Sales), 75 (Security+ V7 on a 100-900 scale is 750).
The practical reading: if a vendor publishes a percentage at all, it is almost always somewhere between 60% and 85%. That range is a useful prior when you are estimating your own readiness — and a useful warning that any specific figure you read for an exam whose vendor does not publish one is fiction.
The extremes, because they are the memorable ones
Two distributions in the same dataset, and they are wildly different:
| Measure | Shortest / fewest | Longest / most |
|---|---|---|
| Time limit | 40 minutes | 1,425 minutes (23h 45m, OSCP practical) |
| Questions | 10 | 180 |
An 18-question exam and a 180-question exam are not the same object with a different label. The 10-question end of the range is almost entirely practical or lab-style assessments, and the long-duration end is the same thing: the OSCP is a 23-hour 45-minute practical exam, not a 180-question multiple-choice test wearing an exam's clothes. Any study plan that treats "the exam" as a uniform format is wrong for the edges of this range.
How to use the data
Every certification in the dataset has its own page with the format, the domain weights and the number of free practice questions available, and every figure states whether it comes from the vendor or from our own record. Where a vendor publishes nothing, the page says so rather than filling the gap.
The complete set is browsable in the certification index, and each provider has its own page — for example Amazon Web Services certifications or CompTIA certifications — with the same figures for every exam that provider offers.
Free practice questions for each of these certifications, scored per domain against the official blueprint, are on the same pages. If you are choosing between two exams, the weights in the table are usually more decisive than the headline number: the exam is decided in the domain that carries the most weight, not by the total.
Where does this data come from?
From the certification bodies themselves: each exam's official page and blueprint, recorded with the source URL and the date it was checked. Figures that are our own estimate rather than a vendor publication are labelled as such on the page where they appear.
Why does this matter if I am only taking one exam?
Because the absence of a published figure is information. If a vendor does not publish a passing score, every specific percentage you read for that exam is someone's guess — and a study plan built on a guess is a study plan built on sand. Knowing which exams publish what tells you which numbers you can trust.
Can I use this data?
Yes. It is published to be used — link to it, quote it, build on it. If you are writing a certification guide or building a comparison table, the per-certification pages have the format, the domains with their weights, the price where it is published and the free practice questions for each one.
Related Articles
Explore more articles on related topics

Cisco CCNA v2.0 in 2027: The AI Topics Cisco Just Added to the Exam
5 min read
CompTIA A+ Core 2 (220-1202): Exam Guide and Strategy
8 min read
CompTIA A+ Core 1 (220-1201): Exam Guide and Strategy
8 min read
CCNA 200-301: Exam Requirements and Study Strategy
8 min readRecommended Certifications
Based on the topics covered in this article
Ready to Master Your Certification?
Join thousands of professionals who are passing their exams with confidence using our adaptive engine.



